Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Indexation Benefit Directed as CIT(A) Omitted Mandatory Section 48 Relief

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ashish Tilakchandra Bhatt Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement
Ashish Tilakchandra Bhatt Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Indexation Mandatory & Cash Deposit Addition Restricted: Ahmedabad ITAT Grants Partial Relief The Ahmedabad “SMC” Bench of the ITAT partly allowed the appeal of Ashish Tilakchandra Bhatt vs. DCIT, Gandhinagar, ITA No. 1503/Ahd/2025, AY 2012-13, vide order dated 18.12.2025 On the capital gains issue, the Tribunal noted that although the CIT(A) had directed the AO to recompute capital gains as per the DVO’s valuation, no explicit direction was given to allow indexation benefit u/s 48. Observing that indexation is a statutory entitlemen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,494

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *