Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bansal Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bansal Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Wrong Sanction Kills Reopening Beyond 3 Years; Alleged Accommodation Entry Needs Verification: ITAT Delhi Grants Relief to Bansal Industries Delhi  ITAT granted substantial relief to the Assessee by remanding the reassessment for AY 2015-16 for verification and quashing the reassessment for AY 2016-17 on jurisdictional grounds. For AY 2015-16, the reassessment was initiated solely on the basis of an Investigation Wing report alleging receipt of accommodation entries of ₹38.75 lakh. The Assessee consistently contended that it had never entered into any ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930