Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bansal Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Bansal Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Wrong Sanction Kills Reopening Beyond 3 Years; Alleged Accommodation Entry Needs Verification: ITAT Delhi Grants Relief to Bansal Industries Delhi  ITAT granted substantial relief to the Assessee by remanding the reassessment for AY 2015-16 for verification and quashing the reassessment for AY 2016-17 on jurisdictional grounds. For AY 2015-16, the reassessment was initiated solely on the basis of an Investigation Wing report alleging receipt of accommodation entries of ₹38.75 lakh. The Assessee consistently contended that it had never entered into any ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai Ad Hoc Commission Cap Without Comparables Invalid; Section 40A(2)(b) Inapplicable: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031