Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Confiscation of gold set aside as no corroborative evidence proved allegation of smuggling

Case Law Details

Case Name
Narru Guru Shantha Siva Kamal Vs Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) (CESTAT Kolkata)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Narru Guru Shantha Siva Kamal Vs Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT Kolkata held that in absence of any cogent and corroborative evidence, gold in question cannot be construed to be of foreign origin or smuggled in nature. Accordingly, god seized is not liable for confiscation under section 111(b) and 111(d) of the Customs Act. 1962. Accordingly, order is set aside. Facts- The present appeal has been filed by Narru Guru Shantha Siva Kamal of Vijayawada (appellant) against the impugned Order-in-Appeal dated 30.10.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Custom...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *