This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Telecom License Fee Held Capital, But Spectrum Charges Allowed as Revenue
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Bharti Hexacom Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Bharti Hexacom Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
License Fee Capital, But SUC Lives On: Bharti Hexacom—ITAT Delhi Applies SC, Splits the Baby Correctly
In a batch of Revenue appeals, core dispute revolved around telecom license fee, spectrum usage charges (SUC), subscriber verification penalty & discount on prepaid instruments. AO had treated variable license fee as capital expenditure u/s 35ABB, disallowed SUC, subscriber verification penalty u/s 37(1) & invoked s.40(a)(ia) r.w.s. 194H on distributor discounts. CIT(A) granted relief on all counts.
ITAT Delhi partly reversed & partly uph...






