Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharti Telemedia Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi): ITA No. 4960 & 624/Del/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Bharti Telemedia Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Variable licence fee of DTH operator not hit by s.35ABB; interest provision is ascertained liability — ITAT Delhi Delhi Tribunal partly allowed Assessee’s appeals & dismissed Revenue appeals. Tribunal held that variable licence fee paid by a DTH operator to Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB) is not covered by s.35ABB, as DTH/broadcasting services are distinct from telecommunication services contemplated under the Act. Tribunal observed that s.35ABB applies only to capital expenditure incurred for acquiring right to operate telecom...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031