Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vivek Kamalkar Kadam Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vivek Kamalkar Kadam Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Addition u/s 69A was sustained by CIT(A) in respect of ₹12.50 lakh cash deposits, treating them as unexplained despite Assessee’s claim that deposits represented repayment of a friendly loan advanced earlier to Shri Gulamnabi Gafoor Shaikh. Tribunal noted that loan of ₹25 lakh, repayment of ₹5 lakh by cheque & ₹7.5 lakh by cash were already accepted by Revenue; only balance ₹12.5 lakh was disputed due to non-availability of deposit slips & alleged failure to prove availability of cash with borrower. ITAT held that Assessee had disch...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930