Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dream Infrastructure Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dream Infrastructure Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) AY 2013-14 Reasons Used for AY 2011-12; Wrong-Year Reasons = Wrong Jurisdiction: Only Right Year, Right Reasons – ITAT Quashes Reopening for AY 2011-12 Assessee’s case was reopened u/s 147 based on information about alleged cash payment of Rs.8,00,000 to Shri Jawahar Mori found in loose sheets seized during survey. AO issued notice u/s 148 on 26.03.2018 & completed reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s.147 on 27.12.2018 treating the amount as income from undisclosed sources. CIT(A) upheld reopening & sustained addition relying on alleged incons...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930