Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Idhayam Infraheights Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Idhayam Infraheights Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) ₹4 Cr Security Deposit Doesn’t Mean Income: ALV Must Be Real, Not Imagined- Security Deposit Can’t Generate Fictional Rent: Notional Interest ≠ Rent: Delhi ITAT Deletes ₹63L Deemed ALV Addition Assessee challenged additions of ₹34,00,000 & ₹29,12,000 made by AO as notional rent u/s 23(1) on ground that it had received an interest-free security deposit of ₹4 Cr while charging a contractual rent of only ₹5,000 per month. AO & CIT(A) treated the deposit as a colourable device, applied SBI interest rate, & computed d...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930