This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Incriminating Evidence, No Addition: ITAT Deletes Jewellery Charges
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Amit Jatia & Smita Jatia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Amit Jatia & Smita Jatia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Third-Party Statement Not Enough- Assessee Need Not Prove a Negative – No Incriminating Material, No Cash Payment—Tribunal Quashes Jewellery Additions
In both appeals arising from search on Jatia Group, AO made additions alleging cash payments for jewellery purchased from Firestar International Pvt Ltd, based solely on the statement of a Firestar employee, Saurabh Shah, & an excel sheet recovered in Firestar’s search. In Amit Jatia’s case, AO treated Rs.28,80,000 as cash paid over & above cheque payment ...





