Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No Incriminating Evidence, No Addition: ITAT Deletes Jewellery Charges

Case Law Details

Case Name
Amit Jatia & Smita Jatia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2014-15
Advertisement Amit Jatia & Smita Jatia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Third-Party Statement Not Enough- Assessee Need Not Prove a Negative – No Incriminating Material, No Cash Payment—Tribunal Quashes Jewellery Additions In both appeals arising from search on Jatia Group, AO made additions alleging cash payments for jewellery purchased from Firestar International Pvt Ltd, based solely on the statement of a Firestar employee, Saurabh Shah, &  an excel sheet recovered in Firestar’s search. In Amit Jatia’s case, AO treated Rs.28,80,000 as cash paid over & above cheque payment ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,926

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *