Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Jatia & Smita Jatia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amit Jatia & Smita Jatia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Third-Party Statement Not Enough- Assessee Need Not Prove a Negative – No Incriminating Material, No Cash Payment—Tribunal Quashes Jewellery Additions In both appeals arising from search on Jatia Group, AO made additions alleging cash payments for jewellery purchased from Firestar International Pvt Ltd, based solely on the statement of a Firestar employee, Saurabh Shah, &  an excel sheet recovered in Firestar’s search. In Amit Jatia’s case, AO treated Rs.28,80,000 as cash paid over & above cheque payment recorded in the b...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031