Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhagirathi Krishnan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhagirathi Krishnan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) AO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 15.02.2023 alleging investment of ₹70 lakh in property & trading transactions, claiming escapement > ₹50 lakh. Assessee replied same day explaining that ₹62 lakh was paid by her husband (supported by bank statements & his ROI showing income of ₹48.87L & ₹72.25L) & balance was from her past savings and gifts. She also showed losses in SBI shares & F&O. AO ignored all these and issued 148 on 25.03.2023—beyond 3 years from end of AY 2016-17—and ultimately made additions of only ₹7,25...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930