Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dnyaneshwar Ekanath Balwadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dnyaneshwar Ekanath Balwadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) 193-Day Delay Condoned- Agriculturist Not Tech-Savvy: Tribunal Says ‘Don’t Throw Out Appeal on Technicality’ Assessee, an individual agriculturist, had not filed ROI for AY 2018-19. Based on financial transactions of ₹2,00,22,000, reassessment was initiated u/s 147 & completed ex-parte u/s 147 r.w.s.144 determining income at ₹5,74,28,150 as Assessee failed to respond to 148 notice & follow-up notices. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, appeal was filed with a delay of 193 days. CIT(A) refused to condone the delay & dismissed the appeal in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 50C & Section 54F Issues; CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930