This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
193-Day Delay Condoned: ITAT Says Don’t Deny Merits to Rural Assessee
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dnyaneshwar Ekanath Balwadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Dnyaneshwar Ekanath Balwadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
193-Day Delay Condoned- Agriculturist Not Tech-Savvy: Tribunal Says ‘Don’t Throw Out Appeal on Technicality’
Assessee, an individual agriculturist, had not filed ROI for AY 2018-19. Based on financial transactions of ₹2,00,22,000, reassessment was initiated u/s 147 & completed ex-parte u/s 147 r.w.s.144 determining income at ₹5,74,28,150 as Assessee failed to respond to 148 notice & follow-up notices.
Before CIT(A)/NFAC, appeal was filed with a delay of 193 days. CIT(A) refused to condone the delay & dismissed the appeal in...


