Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

193-Day Delay Condoned: ITAT Says Don’t Deny Merits to Rural Assessee

Case Law Details

Case Name
Dnyaneshwar Ekanath Balwadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement
Dnyaneshwar Ekanath Balwadkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) 193-Day Delay Condoned- Agriculturist Not Tech-Savvy: Tribunal Says ‘Don’t Throw Out Appeal on Technicality’ Assessee, an individual agriculturist, had not filed ROI for AY 2018-19. Based on financial transactions of ₹2,00,22,000, reassessment was initiated u/s 147 & completed ex-parte u/s 147 r.w.s.144 determining income at ₹5,74,28,150 as Assessee failed to respond to 148 notice & follow-up notices. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, appeal was filed with a delay of 193 days. CIT(A) refused to condone the delay & dismissed the appeal in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,641

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *