This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Evidence, No Relief -Appeal Condoned but Case Lost: Tribunal Upholds 147/144 Additions
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Simon Pavan Kumar Moses Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Simon Pavan Kumar Moses Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Assessee filed appeal with 28 days’ delay, explaining through affidavit that he was unaware of the IT portal process & could download the CIT(A)’s order only with assistance from a CA’s office in the first week of March 2025. Tribunal, noting the explanation as reasonable & with no serious objection from the Department, condoned the delay & admitted the appeal.
Assessee’s case was reopened u/s 147 on the ground that capital gains from property transfer had escaped assessment. Assessee failed to respond to notice u/s 148 & ...




