Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Simon Pavan Kumar Moses Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Simon Pavan Kumar Moses Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Assessee filed appeal with 28 days’ delay, explaining through affidavit that he was unaware of the IT portal process & could download the CIT(A)’s order only with assistance from a CA’s office in the first week of March 2025. Tribunal, noting the explanation as reasonable & with no serious objection from the Department, condoned the delay & admitted the appeal. Assessee’s case was reopened u/s 147 on the ground that capital gains from property transfer had escaped assessment. Assessee failed to respond to notice u/s 148 & ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930