Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Hyderabad Deletes ₹17.55 Lakh Penalty: No Under-Reporting in Accepted 148 Return

Case Law Details

Case Name
Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement
Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) The Tribunal observed that although the assessee did not furnish a return u/s 139(1) for AY 2017-18, she had voluntarily remitted ₹16,00,000 as self-assessment tax well in advance of the notice issued u/s 148. Upon receipt of the notice, she promptly filed the return disclosing long-term capital gains of ₹1,50,68,940, which the Assessing Officer accepted in toto without any variation. The delay in filing the return was attributed to genuine uncertainty surrounding the taxability of gains arising from a Joint Development Agreement involving sh...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

Sayyad Sadak
Name: Sayyad Sadak
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Sayyad Sadak & Associates
Location: Hyderabad, Telangana
Articles Published: 56

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *