This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Hyderabad Deletes ₹17.55 Lakh Penalty: No Under-Reporting in Accepted 148 Return
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Subbalakshmamma Pinnama Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
The Tribunal observed that although the assessee did not furnish a return u/s 139(1) for AY 2017-18, she had voluntarily remitted ₹16,00,000 as self-assessment tax well in advance of the notice issued u/s 148. Upon receipt of the notice, she promptly filed the return disclosing long-term capital gains of ₹1,50,68,940, which the Assessing Officer accepted in toto without any variation. The delay in filing the return was attributed to genuine uncertainty surrounding the taxability of gains arising from a Joint Development Agreement involving sh...






