This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reopening Quashed – Reasons Based on Wrong Facts Mechanical 151 Approval; Rule-27 Legal Ground Allowed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Anushreya Investment Private Limited (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs Anushreya Investment Private Limited (ITAT Kolkata)
Revenue filed appeal against deletion of ₹3,32,62,350 added u/s 68 as alleged bogus short-term capital loss. Assessee, without filing cross-appeal, invoked Rule 27 challenging the validity of reassessment u/s 147/143(3) on the ground that the very notice u/s 148 (27.03.2018) was void, being founded on (i) wrong & vague reasons, and (ii) invalid mechanical approval u/s 151.
AO recorded wrong facts & vague reasons
AO reopened assessment alleging bogus STCL of ₹2,95,99,250 in JMD Telefilms and ₹36,63,100 in Nivyah Infrastruc...
Author Info
