Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Anushreya Investment Private Limited (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Anushreya Investment Private Limited (ITAT Kolkata) Revenue filed appeal against deletion of ₹3,32,62,350 added u/s 68 as alleged bogus short-term capital loss. Assessee, without filing cross-appeal, invoked Rule 27 challenging the validity of reassessment u/s 147/143(3) on the ground that the very notice u/s 148 (27.03.2018) was void, being founded on (i) wrong & vague reasons, and (ii) invalid mechanical approval u/s 151. AO recorded wrong facts & vague reasons AO reopened assessment alleging bogus STCL of ₹2,95,99,250 in JMD Telefilms and ₹36,63,100 in Nivyah Infrastruc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930