This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reassessment Quashed u/s 151 for Wrong Authority Beyond 3 Years
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- JD Jewellers Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
JD Jewellers Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Reassessment Quashed – Approval Taken From Wrong Authority u/s 151; Beyond 3 Years Requires PCCIT Sanction
The Assessee challenged reopening u/s 147 r.w.s.144B on the jurisdictional ground that sanction u/s 151 was wrongly obtained from PCIT instead of PCCIT. The record (page 2 of order) shows that reassessment for AY 2017-18 was initiated on 21.07.2022, clearly beyond 3 years from the end of the relevant AY. As per the amended section 151, where reopening is beyond 3 years, the specified sanctioning authority is PCCIT. However, AO obtained s...
Author Info
