CESTAT Chennai’s order on Visanthi & Co. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise. Analysis of service tax demand for construction services.
In a case between Giri Bahadur and the Ward, ITAT Mumbai dismisses the appeal, upholding disallowance of late PF/ESIC contributions under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act.
Find out if Anandji Kalyanji’s tax assessment dispute was resolved by Section 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn what ITAT Jodhpur ruled in case of Anandji Kalyanji vs. ACIT in this blog post.
The Indian Red Cross Society’s denial of registration under sections 12AB and 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act faces reevaluation by the ITAT due to concerns about compulsory donation fund transfers.
In the case of G.K. Reddy vs. DCIT, Madras High Court has directed the Income Tax Department to lift the attachment of a pension account, considering the age and ailment of the assessee. Learn more about this judgment.
The CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of Hindustan Coca Cola, allowing them a refund and rejecting the concept of unjust enrichment. Learn about the case and its implications.
Kerala High Court allows deposit orders of lesser amounts pending appeal, citing CBDT Office Memorandums not binding on the Commissioner.
In this case study, explore the implications of the CESTAT’s ruling that a refund claim for CENVAT credit cannot be denied for failure to justify inability to utilize it
ITAT Delhi held that commission taxed @2% of the amount of accommodation entries provided by the assessee has not been made on ad hoc basis, however, the same is as per prevailing market rate. Accordingly, the addition is sustained.
CESTAT Mumbai held that that de novo adjudication order has been set aside by the Tribunal and the subsequent demands raised through Section 73(1A) as well as its conformation having been based on the previous conformation orders, the same is liable to be set aside and we do so.
