लेन-देन करते समय बैंक जाने-अनजाने विभिन्न अनुबंध करते हैं जिनमें से कुछ लिखित और औपचारिक होते हैं जबकि कुछ अन्य अनौपचारिक और अलिखित होते हैं। बैंकों द्वारा मान लिए गए कुछ सामान्य संविदात्मक रिश्ते हैं देनदार – लेनदार, लेनदार – देनदार, जमानतदार – जमानतदार, गारंटर – लाभार्थी, गिरवीकर्ता – गिरवी रखने वाला और प्रिंसिपल और […]
Explore the significant changes in MCA forms from V2 to V3 Portal, including DIR-12, DIR-3, DIR-5, INC-22, and more. Learn about new options, attachments, and certifications.
Explore the Dravidian Model of eradicating shelterlessness in India based on social justice, equality, humanity, and rational thinking. A way forward to achieve housing for all.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act unjustified as denial of claim of deduction u/s 80HH/ 80IA doesn’t tantamount to concealment of income and/or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.
ITAT Surat held that addition towards cash deposited during demonetization period unwarranted as booking of railway tickets were allowed by way of old currency notes. Here, cash were received from various travelers for booking of railway tickets.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that any amount deposited during pendency of adjudication proceeding or investigation is in the nature of pre-deposit and principles of unjust enrichment is not applicable.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act confirmed as assessee grossly failed to discharge initial burden of explaining and proving credit entries in the books of account.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessing officer passed final assessment order u/s 144C(13) r.w.s 143(3) without passing a draft assessment order u/s 144C(1), said order being violative of provisions of Sec. 144C(1) deserved to be set aside.
Delhi High Court held that the reasons disclosed for re-opening do not allude to the material that was available to the AO which persuaded him to form a belief that income had escaped assessment. Hence, prerequisite before entering the realm of reassessment/assessment proceedings not met. Accordingly, addition not sustainable.
Delhi High Court held that tax credit could not be extended to the assessee, because it had not paid tax in Thailand, i.e., that benefit under Article 23 of the Indo-Thai DTAA could only be extended in a situation where the tax had actually been paid.
