Commissioner of Customs Vs Dimension Data India Limited (CESTAT Chennai) It is brought out that an amount of Rs.7,23,072/- was rejected by the original authority on the ground that Bill of Entry in regard to RSP based assessed goods has to be reassessed and refund claim has to be filed for the CVD paid by […]
It is held that while considering the material on record, one view is conclusively taken by AO, it would not be open for the AO to reopen the assessment based on the very same material and take another view.
Rameshkumar Tagraji Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) It is noted that the assessee during the first appellate proceeding before Ld. CIT(A) had filed the written submission mainly assailing the validity of the action of the AO to have framed the reassessment order without issuance of mandatory notice u/s 143(2) of the Act and cited the […]
CPC (P) Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) The issue involved in all these appeals being the same, were heard together and disposed by this common order. 2. Brief facts are that the appellants hold Central Excise registration as well as Service Tax registration. During the scrutiny of CENVAT documents, it […]
ITAT held that no addition is maintainable on deemed rent on unsold flats which are shown as stock-in-trade. Dugad Properties Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
SDS Cargo Solutions Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) PCIT had given a categorical finding that the AO has not carried out any enquiries on the issue of CFS charges paid to Continental Warehousing Corporation in light of relevant provisions of the Act which render the assessment order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the […]
Acme Ceramics Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT held that reversal of credit and payment of interest thereon, can be adjusted from the payment of Rs. 2 lacs already made by the appellant. We find that the Tribunal/Court in the judgments cited by the appellant held that even if the assessee agreeing to reverse […]
The DC notes that issue of ratification of pre-CIRP expenses to legal counsel of Bank of Baroda was first discussed by CoC in its 1st meeting dated 03.11.2017 where representatives of other bank objected to include such expenses in IRPC on ground that IRPC should include costs incurred after initiation of the CIRP and not […]
PCIT from whom approval has been taken is not specified authority for approval under Section 148 and Section 148A of Income Tax Act, 1961.
We are substantially covering here the amendment which shall be applicable from 1st April 2023 keeping in mind the changes done w.e.f. 1st April 2022 w.r.t. Change in definitions, thresholds of material transactions, enhanced role of Audit committee, Shareholders Approval on RPT and stock exchange disclosures along with the rationale behind this paradigm shift in the RPT approval and disclosures requirement.
