CESTAT Ahmedabad held that department cannot self assign to itself the duty of declaring bad in law the certificate issued to the importer by Ministry of Renewable Energy or decide title of the goods, even when no one is disputing ownership.
SEBI registered debenture trustees are advised to register/ re-register themselves in FINNET 2.0 system of FIU-India as soon as possible.
ITAT Delhi held that rent including service tax on rent paid for the purpose of business is allowable under section 30 of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Delhi held that authority is not permitted to retain the excess amount paid by the appellant because of an error in EDI system. Authority is duty bound to refund such amount.
Merely the parties agreed to not to charge/pay interest on loan will not vitiate the genuineness of such loan transaction unless and until the revenue brought some cogent material on record to prove that such transaction of loan is not genuine.
IBBI notes that rule 8(3)(g) mandates an RV to mention the nature and sources of information relied upon during the valuation. Further, rule 8(3)(j) mandates the RV to mention major factors that were taken into account during the valuation. Therefore, the Authority finds that the factors considered by the RV during the valuation, and as […]
Operations carried out by the Broker Dealers and Clearing Members, from their respective DR sites located outside GIFT-IFSC and within India, shall be deemed to have been carried out at GIFT-IFSC.
CBIC amends notification No. 11/2017- Union Territory Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 so as to to extend last date for exercise of option by GTA to pay GST under forward charge vide Notification No. 05/2023-Union Territory Tax (Rate) Dated: 09th May, 2023 Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department […]
Section 192 provides deduction of tax ‘at the time of payment’. Admittedly there was no payment of the salary etc, which was foregone as per terms of settlement in mediation proceedings.
On the examination of document submitted to ROC, it is observed that certifying professional had filed e form AOC-4 with wrong attachment
