ITAT Hyderabad held that addition towards unexplained cash deposit unsustainable as onus of establishing the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction duly proved by the assessee.
ITAT Hyderabad held that FCCDs are debt hence interest paid/ payable on FCCDs in to be computed by applying LIBOR plus 200 basis points.
ITAT Delhi held that notional interest cannot be taxed as income as bank statement of the foreign bank account doesn’t show that any interest has been credited.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that CENVAT Credit on warranty service provided free of cost during the warranty period through third parties dealer cannot be denied to the manufacturer.
ITAT Mumbai held that issuance of manual final assessment order without containing DIN (Document Identification Number) is deemed to have never been issued. Accordingly, the impugned order is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that when interest free funds are available with the assessee, it can be said that investments are made out of interest free funds and hence disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act not justifiable.
Principal Commissioners / Commissioners are to ensure that the exporters approaching for paying the duty, etc. are registered with the DGFT in terms of the Public Notice dated 02.04.2023 ibid. These cases under the scheme be monitored and tracked so that there is efficient handling and expeditious closure of these old cases of bona fide EO default in a seamless manner. Suitable mechanism for this should be put in place and closely supervised by the Principal Commissioners / Commissioners.
SEBI may consider grant of certificate to an applicant, notwithstanding that another entity in same group has been previously granted registration by it
KMPs who did not hold Board positions would not be liable under section 135. But all the directors as on that relevant date would be liable on account of the failure to discharge an obligation cast upon them by the law.
ROC Hyderabad penalizes Thrissur Expressway Limited and its officers Rs. 3.75 Lakhs for not appointing an internal auditor, violating Section 138 of Companies Act.
