CESTAT Ahmedabad held that main allegation of manipulation of final boiling point in the test report vis-à-vis- classification of product thereof not clarified in the order Hence impugned order cannot be sustained as all the charges flow from fundamental charge of manipulating test report.
CESTAT Chennai held refund claim of service tax paid by mistake eligible as Chartered Accountant certificate stated that the statutory records are examined and the incidence of duty has not been passed on, accordingly doctrine of unjust enrichment doesn’t apply.
GST Registration can be rejected due to an unregistered rent agreement? Get insights into a statutory analysis on the matter with this blog post. Keyphrase: GST Registration – Unregistered Rent Agreement – A statutory analysis.
ITAT Delhi held that benefit u/s 54 of the Income Tax Act duly available the amount equivalent to the capital gains has been utilized for acquisition of new house
ITR form furnished before us is highly complicated and since the different column of the ITR was not interlinked, therefore, there was no auto-correction and hence there was mismatch of figures in the relevant/corresponding columns of ITR.
Arvind Purseth Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Cuttack) It was submitted by the ld. Sr. DR that the only issue in the appeal of the assessee was that TDS had not been deducted in respect of payments made to M/s Sundaram Finance Ltd. and M/s Gulshan Freight Carrier. It was the submission that Form 26A had been […]
This has reference to the circular on submission of Reinsurance Returns and Programme vide ref no. IRDA/RI/CIR/MISC/01 1/01/2019 dated 1 5th January,201 9. On comprehensively examining the extant returns being submitted, the following returns are hereby dispensed with immediate effect.
ITAT note that the benefit of deduction u/s 11 of the Act has been denied by the authorities below primarily on the reasoning that the trust was not registered under the provision of section 12A of the Act.
Section 51 of the OVAT Act read with Rule 55 of the OVAT Rules provides a special mode of recovery of outstanding amount of tax, interest and penalty. Even these provisions do not authorize recovery of outstanding taxes of a Company from the accounts of its individual Directors.
The Timberland Vs Commissioner of GST & CE (Appeals) (CESTAT Chennai) In paragraph-7 of the impugned order, the first appellate authority has clearly recorded that the appellant did not submit the Country of Origin Certificate as prescribed, either during the assessment stage or appellate stage. Against this, the learned Consultant would contend that the Bill […]
