F. No.528/10/2021-STO(TU) Government of India Department of Revenue Ministry of Finance (Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs) Tariff Unit, North Block, New Delhi Circular No: 20/2022-Customs | Dated: 22nd September, 2022 To, All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive) All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs and Central Tax All Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of […]
Renatus Procon Private Ltd. Vs Authority for Clarification and Advance Ruling (Madras High Court) HC held that with the enacting of the TNGST Act, 2018, the Authority for Clarification and Advance Ruling does not exist in the form in which it did under the TNVAT Act and hence, the application filed by the petitioner does […]
Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue New Delhi Office Memorandum No. S-31011/12/2021-DIR(NC)-DOR | dated 22nd September, 2022 Subject: Constitution of Group of Ministers (GoM) on GST System Reforms reg. In partial modification to the OM of even number dated 24.09.2021 on the subject cited above, it is stated that reconstituted membership of […]
HC Held that respondent-bank (SIDBI) cannot withdraw from offer of One-time Settlement which is already accepted by the petitioner/ borrower.
There was no levy of duty on compounded basis on Tin Packing machine and on pouches which had not been packed with the aid of packing machine, but were packed manually with the help of hand operated fillers or similar manually operated device and sealed with heat sealers/band sealers/candles/hot iron and the like.
Held that ex parte order of ad interim injunction granted before notice to opposite party under the proviso to Rule 3 of Order XXXIX C.P.C.. cannot be treated at part with other ex parte orders/decree.
Held that ad-interim injunction provided from the use of TATA in website tatabonus.com; crypto products by the name of $TATA or any other product being sold on the website www.hakunamatata.finance.
SC Held that the numerical strength of the Judges taking a particular view is not relevant, but the Bench strength is determinative of the binding nature of the Judgment.
Purabdhani Enterprise Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) In this case two show cause notice were issued for cancellation of GST Registration. While the earlier show cause notice dated 9.11.2021 seeking cancellation of registration was based on the ground that firm of the petitioner was non-existent and that business was not being run, the […]
Navigating Expat Tax in India made easy. Learn about the tax rules, rates, and exemptions for expats working in India.
