Considering the fact that the petitioner has also not been able to utilize the credit of duty under the provisions of GST which came to be effected from 01.07.2017, legitimate export incentives cannot be denied to the petitioner. I find no merits in denying the benefit of refund claim filed by the petitioner under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Rules, 2004. The respondent shall therefore refund the amount to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Teleperformance Global Services Private Limited Vs Acit (Bombay High Court) The Supreme Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki had considered that income, which was subject to be charged to tax for the assessment year 2012-13 was the income of erstwhile entity prior to amalgamation. Transferee had assumed liabilities of transferor company, including that of […]
In search assessment, any undisclosed income, which can ultimately be added, is only to the extent of any unrecorded assets/material found or any incriminating documents found as representing undisclosed income earned, since, AO had not made any specific reference to the incriminating material found during the search in respect of additions made by him, therefore, assessment so framed, was bad in law.
Vodafone Idea Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) We find that in the instant case, the AO had made disallowance on depreciation on 3G Spectrum Fees to the tune of Rs. 408.01 crores. And if the said disallowance is ignored, the net result of remaining additions would only result in assessed loss and hence no tax […]
New Delhi Tyre House Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) In this case a Ground is on account of confirmation of disallowances out of telephone tours, and other expenses including depreciation on the car stating that involvement of the personal element of the partners of the firm cannot be ruled out. Both the lower authorities have confirmed […]
Bundy India Limited Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of CORONATION SPINNING INDIA (Supra) has held that interest of refund on penalty is not admissible under Section 11BB. As a result I do not find the appellants are entitled to any refund of interest on penalty amount under Section […]
Deduction u/s 54 of the Act. Can be claimed as per law even construction of the house has not been completed and not occupied by the assessee Addition of Rs. 300000.00 on account of disallowance of deduction u/s 54 The assessee has shown income from Long Term capital gain from sale of property at Ambala […]
AAR held that, the supply of medicines, surgical items, implants, consumables and other allied services & items provided by the hospital through their hospital in-house pharmacy, as well as food, room on rent, other services to the in-patients admitted to hospital for diagnosis, or medical treatment or procedures is part of composite supply of health care treatment service and is exempted
Innomit Mineral Projects Pvt Ltd. Vs Additional Commissioner of Customs (Madras High Court) The petitioner appears to be a victim of the chinese exporter. The petitioner had made a victim of fraud. The petitioner therefore, seek refund of the customs duty paid at the time of filing of Bill of Entry under the self assessment […]
Pankaj Behari Saha Vs State of Tripura (High Court Tripura) Petitioner is a dealer and was registered under the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (TVAT Act, for short) at the relevant time. The Superintendent of Taxes, Udaipur issued a notice on 31.01.2019 to the petitioner under Section 53(3) of the TVAT Act conveying to […]
