Follow Us :

Archive: 30 March 2010

Posts in 30 March 2010

Amendment of para 2.37 A of HBP Vol.1

March 30, 2010 804 Views 0 comment Print

Import authorizations for a restricted item, if so directed by the competent authority, shall be issued for import through one of the sea ports or air ports or ICDs or LCS, as per the option indicated, in writing, by the applicant. However, for import of rough marble, port of registration is mandatory and the applicant must indicate the same in the application itself.

Income Tax department technically equipped to detect fraud or hidden information

March 30, 2010 792 Views 0 comment Print

To outsmart tax evaders who resort to delete their financial data or hide it in password-protected devices during search operations, the I-T department has started including portable forensic labs and experts in its team. The department has unearthed links to more than Rs 1,000 crore money in the last few searches with the help of cyber forensics, according to sources.

Revision- A possible view not unsustainable in law cannot be revised

March 30, 2010 633 Views 0 comment Print

assessee therefore, cannot be subjected to the exercise of the jurisdiction under s. 263. Therefore, the Tribunal was not justified in upholding the order of the CIT, passed under s. 263, directing the AO to include the sum of Rs. 1,75,32,600 in the total income of the assessee under s. 41(1), in the previous year, relevant to asst. yr. 1982-83

Incorrect assumption of facts, or incorrect application of law can only satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous

March 30, 2010 840 Views 0 comment Print

Thus, the view taken by AO cannot be said to be erroneous which will render the assessment order as erroneous. Neither the AO has drawn incorrect assumption of facts nor AO has rendered incorrect application of law when he accepted the claim of the assessee that advertisement and publicity expenses were allowable as business expenditure

Block assessment has to be based on evidences and not best judgment

March 30, 2010 1015 Views 0 comment Print

Under s. 158BB, the procedure for computing the undisclosed income of the block period has been given. It provides that the undisclosed income of the block period shall be the aggregate of the total income of the previous years falling within the block period computed, in accordance with the provisions of this Act, on the basis of evidence found

Dual Audit may be a reality soon

March 30, 2010 594 Views 0 comment Print

Will we see a company audited by two audit firms at the same time? That looks a possibility from what the Union Minister of State for Corporate Affairs and Minority Affairs, Mr Salman Khurshid, said on 29.03.2009 while Addressing a meeting of the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), Mr Khurshid said, in the context of making the audit function effective, that there had emerged an idea of dual audit so that there are two companies (firms) in a sense keeping a check on each other.

Notification No. 22/2010-Service Tax dated 30th March, 2010

March 30, 2010 330 Views 0 comment Print

Amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.09/2010-Service Tax, dated the 27 th February, 2010, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 153 (E), dated the 27 th February, 2010

Notification No. 21/2010-Service Tax dated 30th March, 2010

March 30, 2010 438 Views 0 comment Print

amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.08/2010-Service Tax, dated the 27th February, 2010, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 152 (E), dated the 27th February, 2010

Notification No. 20/2010-Service Tax dated 30th March, 2010

March 30, 2010 360 Views 0 comment Print

Makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.07/2010-Service Tax, dated the 27 th February, 2010, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 151 (E), dated the 27 th February, 2010

Salaried taxpayer received notice for payment of tax despite no dues because of system error

March 30, 2010 606 Views 0 comment Print

A computer error in the office of the income tax department is causing anxiety to scores of taxpayers across the Mumbai city. Several salaried employees have received notices from the department demanding up to a few thousand rupees as penalty for deferment of tax payment. Officials admit it is a mistake and have set up a counter at the Bandra-Kurla Complex office to redress the issue.

Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031