Income Tax : Explore the rules and regulations governing cash transactions in real estate deals to ensure tax compliance. Learn about permissib...
CA, CS, CMA : जानें जीएसटी और आयकर एक्ट में नकद संव्यवहार के नि...
Income Tax : Dive into critical tax regulations and provisions, from related party payments to cash disallowance, and learn how they impact you...
Income Tax : Discover why Section 40A(3) limits cash payments and promotes a cashless economy, including reduction of black money generation. P...
Income Tax : Learn about Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, which disallows deductions for cash expenditures exceeding Rs. 10,000. Explore r...
Income Tax : It is suggested that there should be a positive provision under the I.T. Act that any transaction involving more than Rs.3,00,000/...
Income Tax : In PCIT Vs Mahabir Jute Mills Lts., the Allahabad High Court ruled that if books of accounts are not objected to, the AO cannot di...
Income Tax : Calcutta High Court ruling states payments by supervisors to individual labourers, each not exceeding Rs. 20,000, cannot be disall...
Income Tax : Analysis of Bharat Jaroli vs PCIT case by ITAT Indore, highlighting AO's failure to scrutinize cash payments under Sec 40A. Detail...
Income Tax : Read the full text of the ITAT Chandigarh's decision in the case of Manuj Jain HUF Vs PCIT. The assessment order was upheld, rejec...
Income Tax : Explore case of Manipal Hospitals (Dwarka) Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT where ITAT Bangalore ruled that AO cannot make adhoc disallowance unde...
Discrepancies in KYC docs don’t constitute incriminating material. ITAT cancels income tax addition for Renukamata Multi-State Co-op Society Ltd. vs ACIT.
Explore the Kerala High Court judgment in P.V. Thomas Vs ITO, upholding Income Tax Act Section 40 (3) addition. Detailed analysis and implications for assessment year 2015-2016.
Explore the JCIT vs S.V. Balasubramani HUF case at ITAT Chennai. Learn why bonus payment disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act was challenged and the outcome of the appeal.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that in case of bogus purchases, if the sale is not in doubt, then only the profit element embedded in such purchases should be subject to tax in the hands the assessee. Accordingly, CIT(A) restricting disallowance to 25% of the addition justified.
Dive into critical tax regulations and provisions, from related party payments to cash disallowance, and learn how they impact your deductions. Uncover the complexities of tax compliance.
Discover why Section 40A(3) limits cash payments and promotes a cashless economy, including reduction of black money generation. Prohibited transaction in cash/limit on cash transactions.
Learn about Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, which disallows deductions for cash expenditures exceeding Rs. 10,000. Explore rules, exceptions, and changes.
ITAT Delhi held that the payment of assessee made in cash in violation of section 40A(3) of the Act is not eligible for benefit of exceptions envisages under Rules 6DD(f) in absence of any evidence supporting identity and genuineness of the supplier.
ITAT Chennai held that addition based merely on presumptions and assumptions and without allowing cross-examination is unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside.
ITAT Delhi held that the cash deposited out of sales cannot be treated as income u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act once the sales are not disputed by the revenue.
