Income Tax : Stay updated with the latest TDS compliance under Section 192 of the I.T. Act, emphasizing the importance of Form 12BB for employe...
Income Tax : Read about Supreme Court's decision in US Technologies case regarding TDS penalty under Section 271C of Income Tax Act, 1961, for ...
Income Tax : Learn about the penalties and prosecutions under the Income Tax Act of 1961 for various defaults and offenses. Find out the fines ...
Income Tax : It is proposed to amend section 271C inserting two new sub-clauses under clause (b) in sub-section (1) providing reference to the ...
CA, CS, CMA, Income Tax : Understand the consequences of non-payment of TDS/TCS & non-filing of TDS/TCS returns. Learn about the penalties and legal implica...
Income Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court quashes prosecution against Aditya Institute for delayed TDS deposit, citing reasonable cause under Sect...
Income Tax : Detailed analysis of ITO vs Turner General Entertainment Networks India Pvt. Ltd. case before ITAT Delhi. Penalty order deemed inv...
Income Tax : In Ambience Pvt Ltd vs ITO (ITAT Delhi), the issue of TDS penalty under sec 271C is discussed. Analysis reveals why penalty wasn't...
Income Tax : Explore the detailed analysis of the Satya Kiran Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO case regarding TDS deduction disputes, its implicati...
Income Tax : Madras High Court halts Rs. 9403.09 Cr Income Tax demand against Cognizant Technology Solutions India. Detailed analysis and impli...
Andhra Pradesh High Court quashes prosecution against Aditya Institute for delayed TDS deposit, citing reasonable cause under Section 278AA of the Income Tax Act.
Detailed analysis of ITO vs Turner General Entertainment Networks India Pvt. Ltd. case before ITAT Delhi. Penalty order deemed invalid due to limitation.
In Ambience Pvt Ltd vs ITO (ITAT Delhi), the issue of TDS penalty under sec 271C is discussed. Analysis reveals why penalty wasn’t justified due to a bonafide belief.
Explore the detailed analysis of the Satya Kiran Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO case regarding TDS deduction disputes, its implications, and the ITAT Delhi’s verdict.
Stay updated with the latest TDS compliance under Section 192 of the I.T. Act, emphasizing the importance of Form 12BB for employers and employees.
Madras High Court halts Rs. 9403.09 Cr Income Tax demand against Cognizant Technology Solutions India. Detailed analysis and implications of the order.
Since assessee had deliberately not avoided TDS and there was no contumacious conduct on the part of the assessee, therefore, penalty was not leviable for not deducting TDS on foreign remittances.
In a landmark case, Oriental Bank challenges penalties imposed by ITAT Jaipur for TDS non-compliance. Learn about the legal battle and its implications.
Read about Supreme Court’s decision in US Technologies case regarding TDS penalty under Section 271C of Income Tax Act, 1961, for delayed remittance.
ITAT Delhi held that the assessee has not committed any violation of provision of Chapter XVII B of the Act by making payment towards External Development Charges (EDC) to Directorate of Town and Country Planning, Haryana (Haryana Government) (DGTCP) through banking channel favoring Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA).
