The Companies Act 2013 is a crucial legislation in India governing the incorporation, functioning, and management of companies. Learn about the key provisions, compliance requirements, and legal framework under the Companies Act 2013.
CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive guide covering 175 legal compliances for July 2026 under FEMA, Income Tax, GST, SEBI, Companies Act, Labour Laws, ...
Company Law : The Companies Act, 2013 requires most companies to hold four Board Meetings annually, while OPCs, Small Companies, and Dormant Com...
Company Law : This guide provides a complete AGM compliance tracker covering pre-AGM, AGM-day, post-AGM, and IEPF obligations under the Companie...
Company Law : MCA has revised the Director KYC framework, requiring DIR-3 KYC (Web) only once every three financial years. The changes reduce co...
Company Law : Learn how the Companies Act, 2013 regulates managerial remuneration through profit-linked limits, approval requirements, and gover...
Company Law : MCA has cautioned stakeholders against phishing calls, WhatsApp messages, emails, fake websites, and ZIP attachments impersonating...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the Government to amend the law to allow Company Secretaries in Practice to appear before DRTs and DRATs. It argues...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the MCA to ensure eligible companies comply with Section 203 by appointing Whole-time Company Secretaries. The repr...
Corporate Law : NSO has launched the Annual Survey of Incorporated Services Sector Enterprises (ASISSE) to collect comprehensive economic and oper...
Company Law : ICSI has requested the MCA to grant compliance relaxations following technical disruptions caused by the Data Centre fire. The pro...
Company Law : Madhya Pradesh HC dismissed a winding up petition, holding that a bona fide dispute over liability required adjudication before th...
Company Law : NCLT retained the freeze on assets citing serious SFIO findings but ordered defreezing of the salary account and family members' a...
Corporate Law : The Court ruled that, without a transfer application and parallel insolvency proceedings, shifting a winding-up case to NCLT was u...
Company Law : NCLT permitted stakeholder meetings after accepting clarifications on forfeited warrants, disclosures, and scheme compliance under...
Company Law : The NCLAT held that CFO nominees must satisfy the eligibility requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act. It set aside th...
Company Law : MCA has allowed companies to file Form DPT-3 for FY 2025-26 without additional fees until 31 July 2026 due to disruptions caused b...
Company Law : MCA notifies the New Development Bank under Section 2(11)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013, specifying it as a body corporate for th...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Learn about the penalty imposed on Tablespace Technologies Pvt. Ltd. by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs for violating Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Lantiq Communications India Pvt Ltd faces penalties for CSR non-compliance under Sections 134 and 135 of the Companies Act. Penalties for directors include ₹1,00,000 each.
Understand the concept of Alternate Director under Section 161(2) of Companies Act, 2013. Learn about appointment conditions, procedures, and criteria.
Water and Sanitation for Urban Poor NGO penalized for non-compliance with board meeting requirements from 2011 to 2019. Detailed adjudication order inside.
Mars Mercantiles Pvt Ltd’s penalty for violating Section 158 of the Companies Act was reduced by the Regional Director (ER) to ₹1.5 Lakhs on appeal.
The Regional Director, Eastern Region, reduces the penalty imposed on Mayflower Infra Realty Pvt. Ltd. and its Director for violating Section 161 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Company earned over 10% of turnover from a related party but failed to get shareholder approval, violating section 188. MCA imposes a penalty.
Tablespace Technologies fined ₹1,00,000 for failing to disclose director’s interests as required by Section 184 of the Companies Act.
Khed Developers’ appeal against a ₹12 lakh penalty for failing to form an Audit Committee was dismissed. Learn about the case, its implications, and the Regional Director’s ruling.
MCA RD confirmed a ₹12 lakh penalty for Khed Developers Ltd. due to non-constitution of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee as required by the Companies Act.
