Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how IMS makes accepted invoice records the basis for ITC eligibility, strengthening compliance, fraud detecti...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains how the GSTAT held that a mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B is insufficient to invoke Section 74 witho...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that a mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B does not automatically establish tax evasion or justify proceedings und...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue concerns confusion regarding the purpose and sequencing of GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B filings. The key takeaway is that GSTR-1 s...
Goods and Services Tax : ICAI clarified that ITC wrongly reversed under Table 4(B)(1) instead of Table 4(B)(2) can still be reclaimed within statutory time...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government introduced reforms such as e-invoicing and auto-population of data in GST returns. These measures improve accuracy,...
Goods and Services Tax : ICAI writes to CBIC requesting a one-week extension for the September 2025 GSTR-3B due date, citing the Diwali festival period and...
Goods and Services Tax : Important change in Table 6 of GSTR-9 for FY 24-25 - Taxpayers can now report ITC of previous financial year that was claimed in ...
Goods and Services Tax : BCAS requests extension of GSTR-3B filing and payment deadline for Sep 2025, arguing the original date of Oct 20 coincides with Di...
Goods and Services Tax : Due to severe floods in Maharashtra, MCTC has requested a three-day extension for the GSTR-3B filing deadline, citing hardships fa...
Goods and Services Tax : The assessment was based on four discrepancies: reconciliation issues between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, input tax credit (ITC) mismatch ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court ruled that ITC for FY 2018-19 cannot be denied merely because import and SEZ transactions were absent fro...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court remanded an ex parte assessment arising from a GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch after finding that the assessee ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court quashed ex-parte GST adjudication orders after the taxpayer claimed it could explain discrepancies betwee...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court rules GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B mismatch from clerical errors cannot trigger automatic tax recovery without Rule 88C pr...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC extends due date for filing March 2026 GSTR-3B to April 21, 2026, for registered persons under Section 39 of the CGST Act....
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN clarified that system-calculated interest for February 2026 was incorrectly reflected in March returns due to a technical iss...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Portal revises interest computation in GSTR-3B, factoring minimum cash ledger balance and auto-populating non-editable interes...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Network has issued an advisory introducing significant system enhancements in GSTR-3B beginning with the January 2026 tax peri...
Goods and Services Tax : The advisory clarifies that from November 2025, auto-populated values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B cannot be manually edited. Any corre...
Patna High Court directs GST authorities to allow rectification of GSTR-3B return to align with GSTR-1, citing inadvertent clerical error and judicial precedents.
Madras HC directs Shalu Cabs to appeal ex-parte GST order, citing accountant’s failure to inform, permits appeal beyond limitation if filed promptly.
GSTN advisory confirms GSTR-3B Table 3.2 will remain editable for now, reversing earlier plan, following taxpayer feedback. File returns accurately.
Madras High Court held that claim of Input Tax Credit [ITC] barred by limitation in terms of section 16(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [CGST Act] but within period prescribed u/s. 16(5) is duly allowable.
Madras High Court held that Input Tax Credit (ITC) barred by limitation in terms of section 16(4) of the CGST Act but within period prescribed in terms of section 16(5) of CGST Act is eligible. Accordingly, order quashing ITC set aside.
Allahabad HC: Filing a certified copy of the appealed GST order is a procedural requirement, not mandatory if the appeal is filed electronically with a copy.
GSTN issued advisories on SPL forms, IRN case insensitivity from June 2025, GSTR-1 Table 12 changes, and GSTR-3B Table 3.2 auto-population becoming non-editable from April 2025.
Madras HC quashes ITC denial for Shanker Impexx, citing retrospective CGST amendment extending GSTR-3B filing deadline for ITC claims.
Detailed guidance on reporting eligible, ineligible ITC, and reversals in GSTR-3B. Covers imports, RCM, ISD, POS rules, and ITC reclaim.
It is submitted that if the rectification as sought for is allowed, the petitioner would be entitled to a refund of 74,61,65,427/- for the period between July 2017 to November 2017.
