Understand the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and its impact on businesses. Learn about GST rates, compliance requirements, and its role in simplifying taxation. Stay updated with the latest GST news and updates.
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains why retrospective GST cancellation alone should not result in ITC denial where buyers have complied with Sect...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT offers broader powers than the First Appellate Authority but faces challenges relating to pre-deposit, timelines, and digita...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that notifications under Sections 9 and 11 of the CGST Act cannot go beyond GST Council recommendations...
Goods and Services Tax : Explains when to issue a Tax Invoice or Bill of Supply under GST and how the correct document helps avoid ITC disputes, notices, a...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains that GSTAT can condone delay only within the statutory extension under the CGST Act, unlike CESTAT....
Goods and Services Tax : A PIB backgrounder explains how nine years of GST have expanded the taxpayer base, increased collections, and simplified India's i...
Goods and Services Tax : Haryana recorded the highest State GST revenue growth of 32% during the first quarter of FY 2026-27, outperforming all other state...
Goods and Services Tax : The representation requests extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persistent technical issues ...
Goods and Services Tax : A representation seeks extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persistent technical issues on th...
Goods and Services Tax : The Advocates Tax Bar Association has requested extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persiste...
Income Tax : ITAT held that GST refund is not taxable where the tax component was never claimed as expenditure and was recorded as a receivable...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that a single GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is without jurisdiction and imper...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that clubbing five assessment years in a single GST show cause notice is contrary to Section 73 of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay High Court held that a GST order based on a notice issued to a dissolved company is void, while allowing fresh proceedings ...
Goods and Services Tax : Chhattisgarh HC granted bail after finding no unimpeachable document proving the applicant owned the firm. Issues of involvement w...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has shifted the FY 2025-26 AATO amendment window to 1–31 July 2026 due to system upgrades. Tax officer review will take pla...
Goods and Services Tax : June 2026 gross GST collections reached Rs. 1.94 lakh crore, driven by higher domestic and import revenues, while net collections ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government has fixed 31 July 2026 as the last date for filing GST Appellate Tribunal appeals and applications in specified old...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC clarified that proceedings validly initiated before a taxpayer's jurisdiction changes remain legally valid. The new jurisdict...
CA, CS, CMA : KSCAA has urged the Government to extend the GSTAT appeal filing deadline by three months, citing technical glitches, procedural a...
The Court examined whether ITC could remain blocked under Rule 86A beyond one year on the same allegations. It held that continuation or re-blocking without fresh grounds is impermissible, and the blocked credit must be released.
The High Court examined a GST demand raised beyond the amount mentioned in the show-cause notice. Holding it violative of Section 75(7), the Court quashed the demand and ordered fresh adjudication.
The judgment clarified that merely assisting a foreign entity does not amount to arranging supplies between third parties. Without such facilitation, intermediary provisions and related tax demands cannot be sustained.
Services rendered without consideration were taxed as deemed supplies but denied export benefits. The Court flagged the statutory conflict and directed CBIC to clarify.
The Court examined whether tax authorities could recover the full disputed tax despite pending appellate remedies. It held that recovery beyond the statutory pre-deposit limits under GST law was impermissible.
The Court held that recovery could be stayed and bank attachment lifted if 20% of the disputed amount is deposited, directing the appellate authority to decide the pending appeal on merits.
The Court remanded multiple GST assessment orders where the taxpayer failed to reply to show cause notices, subject to a 50% pre-deposit. A separate penalty order for delayed returns was upheld.
Reversal ordered due to cancelled registration was set aside once the cancellation itself was undone. The ruling reaffirmed the linkage between valid cancellation and ITC reversal.
The authority rejected the refund citing non-submission of LUT before export. The court found that the clarification allowing ex post facto LUT was ignored and ordered reconsideration.
The court held that cancellation for six months’ non-filing could be revoked where the explanation was genuine. Restoration was allowed subject to strict compliance with return filing and payment conditions.
