Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
Amara Raja Media faced a penalty for delayed appointment of a Company Secretary. The penalty was reduced to ₹1.5 lakh after an appeal citing COVID-19 challenges.
Registrar of Companies imposes penalty on Atomy Enterprise India Pvt Ltd for non-compliance with Section 90 of Companies Act, 2013. Read the case details and analysis.
Newraise Alayam Groups Pvt Ltd and its directors fined ₹5 lakh by Chennai ROC for violating Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013, due to failure to maintain a registered office. The company also faces penalties for not filing financial statements since incorporation.
Appeal by A-One Steels India Pvt. Ltd. challenges penalties for failing to appoint a company secretary under Companies Act, 2013.
Registrar of Companies, Kerala imposes penalties on Lakshyam Nidhi Limited for violations of Section 12(1) & 12(4) of Companies Act, 2013.
Regional Director, Eastern Region, modifies penalty for secretarial audit violations under Section 204, reducing it to ₹32 lakh from ₹48 lakh.
Hind Woollen and Hosiery Mills fined for violations under Sections 118(1) and 118(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, regarding minutes of Board meetings.
Registrar of Companies imposes penalties on directors of Hind Woollen & Hosiery Mills Pvt Ltd for failing to disclose interests in companies under Section 184(1).
Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad, penalizes Virupaksha Organics Ltd ₹79.40 lakh for non-appointment of a Company Secretary and CFO, violating Companies Act, 2013.
Regional Director, Eastern Region, reduces penalty for Section 158 DIN violations to ₹2.25 lakh in the MPS Distributors Pvt. Ltd. case. Appeal details inside.
