Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
An ROC Hyderabad order imposes a penalty on Chiraharit Limited and its directors for violating Section 42(6) of the Companies Act, 2013, by not opening a separate bank account for a preferential issue.
The Registrar of Companies, Mumbai, has issued a penalty against Maxwell Life Science and its directors for failing to include mandatory disclosures in their Board Report for FY 2021-22.
ROC Goa fined SKEXXA Technology Pvt Ltd and its directors ₹50,000 each for not maintaining a registered office as required under Section 12 of the Companies Act.
ROC Mumbai found compliance lapses at Business Asia Consulting Pvt Ltd but dropped penalty as violations were already compounded under the Companies Act.
Mega Structures Realestate Limited and its MD, Rajkumar Gadge, fined ₹5.5 Lakh by ROC Goa for violating Section 187 of the Companies Act, 2013, by not holding company assets in its own name.
ROC Goa imposed penalties on Mega Structures Realestate Ltd and its Managing Director for violating Section 187 of Companies Act by not transferring assets in company’s name.
ROC Mumbai imposed penalties on Dystar India and its officer for non-compliance with Section 118 of the Companies Act on board meeting minutes.
ROC Mumbai adjudicated a case against Dystar India Pvt Ltd over Section 12 compliance. No penalty was imposed after proof of signage was provided.
ROC Mumbai imposes penalty on Dystar India Pvt Ltd and its directors for violation of Section 118(11) of Companies Act, 2013 regarding board meeting minutes.
ROC Goa penalises Mega Structures Realestate Ltd and its MD for violation of Section 187(4) of Companies Act, 2013 over assets not held in company’s name.