Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court examined whether a taxpayer’s selection of “No” for personal hearing could override the statutory req...
Goods and Services Tax : The Orissa High Court examined whether tax could be demanded after reversal of the disputed ITC. It held that raising a fresh dema...
Goods and Services Tax : The Rajasthan High Court examined whether GST registration could be refused due to non-filing of returns in another State. It held...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court stayed a judgment that held mere uploading of notices and orders on the GST portal does not amount to valid comm...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court refused to bypass the statutory GST appeal mechanism and directed the taxpayer to pursue appellate remedies. How...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Supreme Court's scrutiny of whether supplying cranes for services like loading, unloading, lifting, and shifting qualifies...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the case of Pradeep Kanthed v. Union of India where the Supreme Court issues notice to the Finance Ministry regarding the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax & Ors Vs Safari Retreats Private Limited & Ors (Supreme Court of India) The ...
Goods and Services Tax : The 45th meeting of Goods and Services Tax Council (“GST Council”) is scheduled to be held on September 17, 2021. The Ministry...
Custom Duty, Income Tax : The Karnataka High Court in M/s Pellagic Food Ingredients Private Ltd. v. Union of India [Writ Petition No. 14737/2021[T-CUS] issu...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court ruled that the Supreme Court’s COVID-19 limitation exclusion must be considered while computing timelines...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court held that exoneration under Section 73 does not automatically bar proceedings under Section 74 because both p...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether a single GST show cause notice can cover multiple financial years under Section 7...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court took up a challenge to Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act where ITC was denied despite tax having been paid by the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court prima facie observed that Section 67(4) permits sealing of premises only when access is denied. It issued notice...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 32/2015-Central Excise Dated- 4th June, 2015 Ethanol produced from molasses generated from cane crushed in the ...
Service Tax : Circular No. 184/3/2015-ST Dated the 3rd June, 2015 It is further clarified that exemption from service tax still continues to ser...
Custom Duty : the floods in the State of Jammu and Kashmir (the State) from whole of the duty as specified under the First Schedule and whole of...
Excise Duty : Grants exemption from Basic Excise Duty to goods donated or purchased out of cash donations for the relief and rehabilitation of p...
Custom Duty : New posts have been created in the rank of Commissioners of Customs in DRI and DGCEI for adjudication of cases as investigated by ...
Delhi High Court denies bail cancellation for Sanjay Jaglan, citing no complaint filed after five years of investigation and fulfillment of bail conditions.
Allahabad High Court rules Section 74 GST show cause notice invalid without allegations of fraud, misstatement, or suppression of facts.
Uttarakhand High Court rules GST confiscation invalid if solely based on driver’s reply without owner’s hearing, citing Section 130(4) CGST Act violation.
Allahabad High Court rules GST demand order cannot exceed show cause notice amount, violating Section 75(7) CGST Act, setting aside the higher demand.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that excess stock does not warrant proceedings under Section 130 of the CGST Act, affirming that Sections 73 and 74 apply. Orders were quashed, and refunds directed.
Delhi High Court rules GST refunds cannot be denied by disregarding a binding High Court order without a pending appeal or stay, directing prompt processing.
Allahabad High Court ruled that GST tax and penalties cannot be imposed for e-way bill issues if there’s no tax evasion intent and the bill was generated before detention.
The Bombay High Court set aside a GST recovery notice issued to a bank, ruling that the taxpayer must receive prior notice and an opportunity to dispute liability under Section 79(1)(c) of the CGST Act.
The Madras High Court directed a fresh GST assessment, citing a violation of natural justice when a taxpayer’s emailed reply was ignored and no personal hearing was granted.
Madras High Court sets aside an ex-parte GST order, emphasizing that portal-only notice isn’t effective if unresponded to, mandating other service modes.
