This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Promotional Support Services Are Not Intermediary Services: CESTAT Chandigarh
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Airbnb India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Airbnb India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh)
The appeal before CESTAT Chandigarh challenged the Order-in-Appeal dated 28.02.2020, which upheld rejection of the appellant’s refund claim of ₹3,25,50,445 for the period April 2017 to June 2017. The refund of unutilized CENVAT credit claimed under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was denied on the ground that the promotional and marketing support services rendered by the appellant to M/s Airbnb Ireland were intermediary services and, therefore, not export of services.
The appellant submi...





