Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maturam Construction company Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Maturam Construction Company Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi) The appeal before the CESTAT Delhi arose from an order of the Commissioner (Appeals), who partly allowed the appellant’s appeal while upholding part of the service tax demand confirmed by the Assistant Commissioner. The original show cause notice proposed a service tax demand of Rs. 18,81,005 for the period April 2014 to June 2017. After adjudication, the Assistant Commissioner confirmed a demand of Rs. 7,52,403 with interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994, imposed an equivalent penalty under Section 78 and a penalty ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031