This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT Confirms Franchise Service Tax Liability Due to Lack of Evidence on Unreceived Payments
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Hitech Institute of Advance Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Hitech Institute of Advance Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi)
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant challenging the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), which had confirmed the service tax demand on royalty received from franchisees and set aside the earlier order of the Assistant Commissioner that had dropped the proceedings.
The appellant was registered with the service tax department for providing commercial coaching and training services, maintenance and repair services, and franchise...
Author Info
