This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
PBPT Act Does Not Permit Attachment of Abettor’s Assets Without Benami Finding: SAFEMA
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shrenik Shah Vs Initiating Officer (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Appellate Authority, SAFEMA
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Shrenik Shah Vs Initiating Officer (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
Attachment of Abettor’s Property Invalid Without Proof It Is Benami Property: SAFEMA Tribunal; PBPT Act Does Not Permit Attachment of Abettor’s Assets Without Benami Finding: SAFEMA; SAFEMA Tribunal Says Attachment Can Continue Only Against Benamidar or Beneficial Owner; Property Attachment Quashed Because Authorities Failed to Prove Assets Were Benami; SAFEMA Tribunal Clarifies That Abettors Can Face Prosecution But Not Automatic Property Attachment; Attachment of Bank Accounts and Insurance Polici...
Author Info
