Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sadanand Kadam Vs Initiating Officer (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sadanand Kadam Vs Initiating Officer (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi) Loan with Minister as Guarantor Exposes Benami Deal -CRZ-Violated Property Turns Costly for Duo – ED’s Benami Action Upheld The appeals were filed by Sadanand Kadam (benamidar) & Anil Dattatreya Parab (beneficial owner) against the Adjudicating Authority’s order dated 13.11.2023 confirming Provisional Attachment Order on a resort property at Murud, Dapoli (Survey No. 446), under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The property was initially purchased by Anil Parab in May 2017 for ₹1...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Tags:

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930