Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : St. Jude Medical India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
St. Jude Medical India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad: Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed for Typographical Error in Form 35—Matter Remanded for Merits The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT set aside the order of the Addl./Joint CIT(A) dismissing the assessee’s appeal on the ground that an incorrect section was mentioned in Form No. 35. In the case of St. Jude Medical India Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2022-23, the assessee had inadvertently referred to section 143(1) in the appeal form, whereas the appeal was in fact against an assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930