Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjeevkumar Umakanth Khyade Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjeevkumar Umakanth Khyade Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Ex-parte CIT(A) Order Set Aside Due to Service on Wrong Email — Reassessment Appeal Remanded for Fresh Adjudication The Bangalore Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for statistical purposes and set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A)/NFAC, holding that the assessee was denied effective opportunity of hearing due to service of notices on an incorrect email address. The assessee, an individual who had not originally filed a return, was assessed under Sections 147/143(3) based on information regarding large cash withdrawals ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930