Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Kuldeep Kaur (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Kuldeep Kaur (ITAT Delhi) Notice Must Be Issued, Not Merely Generated- Notice u/s 148 Not Served Before Midnight- Service Failure Fatal – Technical Error in ITBA Cannot Extend Limitation: ITAT Says Reopening Barred by Limitation Despite AO’s Digital Signature Revenue appealed against order of CIT(A)-NFAC dated 28.10.2024 while Assessee filed cross objection challenging the validity of reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s.144B. Core legal issue was whether notice u/s 148 dated 31.03.2021 was issued within limitation. Assessee submitted that although the notice was digitally signed at 07:0...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930