Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sri Senthil Murugan Finance Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sri Senthil Murugan Finance Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Survey-Based Reassessment and Ex-parte CIT(A) Order Set Aside with Cost – Matter Remanded The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered an appeal by a partnership firm against an order passed under section 143(3) read with section 147 for AY 2013–14. Reassessment was initiated on the basis of a survey admission by one of the partners, alleging unaccounted investment in the firm. The Assessing Officer made substantial additions towards undisclosed cash credits under section 69 and business income, resulting in an assessed...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930