Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashish Girish Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-2011
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashish Girish Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹15 Lakh Section 68 Addition: Loan Cannot Be Rejected Solely on Third-Party Statement Without Independent Inquiry The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of Ashish Girish Jain for AY 2010–11, deleting an addition of ₹15,00,000 under Section 68 in respect of an unsecured loan received from Mani Prabha Impex Pvt. Ltd., while upholding the validity of reassessment proceedings. On reopening, the Tribunal held that the reassessment under Section 147 was valid, as it was initiated within four ye...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930