Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Radhey Shyam Suthar Vs DCIT (ITAT Jodhpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Radhey Shyam Suthar Vs DCIT (ITAT Jodhpur) Summary: In the Jodhpur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices issued under Section 142(1) cannot survive where the assessee subsequently furnishes complete details and the assessment is ultimately completed under Section 143(3). The assessees had initially failed to respond to certain statutory notices due to heavy workload relating to audits, return filing, and pending assessments, but later submitted detailed replies with supporting documents, which were accepted ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Can Updated Return Be Filed After Notice Under Sections 143(2), 148A or 148? Gross Receipts Cannot Be Taxed if Charitable Expenditure Was Undisputed: ITAT Delhi ITAT Grants TDS Credit Despite Employer’s Failure to Deposit Tax with Government ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty as Estimated Addition Cannot Justify Penalty ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as AO Failed to Disprove Documentary Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930