This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Deleted for Cash Deposits Linked to Earlier Withdrawals
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Naresh Singh Contractors Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Naresh Singh Contractors Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
ITAT Refuses 2,799-Day Delay Condonation for Lack of Sufficient Cause; No Penalty as Interest in Form 26AS Was Already Taxed: ITAT; No Penalty Under Section 44AD as Income Exceeded Presumptive Rate: ITAT; ITAT Deletes Penalty as Revenue Failed to Disprove Cash Deposit Source; ITAT Rejects Delay Condonation Despite Non-Service Claim.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Agra Bench, adjudicated two appeals relating to Assessment Year 2014-15 arising from the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, New Delhi, dated 30.03.2018. One appe...
Author Info
