Case Law Details
Case Name : DCIT Vs Basheshar Dayal HUF (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Basheshar Dayal HUF (ITAT Delhi)
153C Time-Bar Strikes Again — SLP Pending Can’t Stretch Limitation Beyond Six Years
Delhi ITAT dismissed Revenue’s batch appeals in group cases of Basheshar Dayal, Ankur Gupta (HUF) & Anisha Gupta, holding that assessments framed u/s 153C beyond six AYs were barred by limitation. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)’s view that the six-year block has to be reckoned with reference to the AY in which the satisfaction note was recorded / seized material was handed over to AO of non-searched person, and not otherwise. Since satisfaction note dated 10-05-2022 ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


