Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Om Prakash Bansal (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Om Prakash Bansal (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi quashes assessment – Notice u/s 143(2) by ITO invalid as income exceeded ₹20 lakhs; jurisdiction lay with ACIT/DCIT; ITAT Delhi holds notice u/s 143(2) by non-jurisdictional ITO invalid- 

Assessee, Om Prakash Bansal (HUF), challenged the assessment framed u/s 143(3) on the ground that the notice u/s 143(2) was issued by an officer lacking jurisdiction as per CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011 dt. 31-01-2011. The return declared income of ₹30.71 lakh; hence, jurisdiction legally lay wit

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728