Case Law Details
Case Name : Om Prakash Bansal (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Om Prakash Bansal (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
ITAT Delhi quashes assessment – Notice u/s 143(2) by ITO invalid as income exceeded ₹20 lakhs; jurisdiction lay with ACIT/DCIT; ITAT Delhi holds notice u/s 143(2) by non-jurisdictional ITO invalid-
Assessee, Om Prakash Bansal (HUF), challenged the assessment framed u/s 143(3) on the ground that the notice u/s 143(2) was issued by an officer lacking jurisdiction as per CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011 dt. 31-01-2011. The return declared income of ₹30.71 lakh; hence, jurisdiction legally lay wit
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


