Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nasir Ali Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-2012
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nasir Ali Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) No 120(4)(b) Order, No Jurisdiction –Mere Mention Not Enough- ITAT Quashes Addl. CIT’s Assessment Assessee challenged validity of assessment framed by Addl. CIT, contending that no valid order u/s 120(4)(b) existed empowering Addl. CIT to act as AO. Revenue argued that jurisdiction was mentioned in assessment order & objection was time-barred under s.124(3). However, ITAT noted that under s.2(7A) read with s.120(4)(b), an Addl. CIT can act as AO only if specifically empowered by CBDT/competent authority. Revenue failed to produce any such order/notificati...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930