Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Archana Agarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Archana Agarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

JDA Advance & Loan Repayment Cannot be Treated Bogus – Sec 68 Addition Deleted Where Amount Refunded & Transactions Through Banking Channel – ITAT Kolkata

AO treated ₹70 lakh received as earnest money under Joint Development Agreement as bogus sundry creditor alleging shell company involvement & added u/s 68. Further, repayment of earlier loan of ₹21.07 lakh was also treated as bogus. CIT(A) confirmed additions.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

840-Day Appeal Delay Not Condoned; Blaming CA Not Sufficient Cause: ITAT Bangalore Educational Society Cannot Be Treated as Religious Trust Without Evidence: ITAT Bangalore Sec 270A Penalty: Immunity U/s 270AA Cannot Be Denied Without Hearing – ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Deletes Sec 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained by Earlier Withdrawals Sec 68 Addition on Opening Loans Deleted; Interest & Salary Allowed – ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031